Russian Campaigner Defends Right to Disagree with Putin at Trial Over ‘Fascism’ Article
Advocate Urges Acquittal in Moscow Court
Veteran rights campaigner Oleg Orlov made a passionate plea in a Moscow court on Wednesday, calling for his acquittal on charges of discrediting the armed forces. Orlov argued that Russians have the right to express dissenting opinions about their president, including speaking out against the war in Ukraine. Defending himself in a case centered around a November 2022 article, Orlov asserted that Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, had descended into fascism.
Challenging the Commander-in-Chief
During his closing speech, Orlov posed a thought-provoking question: “Where is it defined that our commander-in-chief (Putin) always rightly understands not only the interests of Russia, but the interests of its citizens?” He emphasized that citizens should be allowed to voice their opinions, even if they differ from those of the president. Orlov further questioned whether the president should be considered infallible, comparing him to a spiritual and secular leader like the Pope.
The Prosecution’s Perspective
In response, the prosecution argued that citizens have a duty to obey laws and that freedom of speech must be exercised responsibly. They cautioned against provocations aimed at dividing civil society. However, considering Orlov’s age and health, the prosecution requested a fine of 250,000 roubles ($2,500) instead of a potential prison sentence of up to three years.
A Verdict Looms
The judge is expected to deliver the verdict later today. Orlov’s case has garnered significant attention due to his status as one of Russia’s most respected rights advocates. He has been a prominent figure at Memorial, an organization that was awarded a share of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022 before being banned and dissolved in Russia.
A Crackdown on Dissent
Since its invasion of Ukraine, the Russian government has intensified its crackdown on political dissent. It has become an offense to “discredit” the armed forces or deviate from the government’s narrative about the war, which they describe as a “special military operation.” This clampdown has resulted in the imprisonment of several notable figures, including opposition politician Vladimir Kara-Murza and prominent opposition figure Alexei Navalny.
As the courtroom drama unfolds, the outcome of Orlov’s trial will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the freedom of expression in Russia.
